Submit your review | |
Scotiabank
Average rating: 0 reviews
Basic Info: 44 King Street West
Toronto ON
M5H 1H1
Regulator(OPC),
Privacy Contact Email escalatedconcerns@scotiabank.com
Last OS File: March 2025 – Missing risk/harm/consequence disclosureÂ
❌ Incomplete
Secure e-signature not provided; no response to request
đź”´ Absent
No communication of risk, harm, or consequence
⚠️ Partial
Provided a sample consent screen, not specific to the user
Recommended changes were identified, but no commitment was made to implement them. The improvements included stronger technological safeguards, particularly around secure electronic signatures, to protect personal information against loss, theft, unauthorized access, disclosure, copying, use, or modification.
It was also recommended that sample consent screens should not be used to replace actual user interaction, in order to avoid confusion and ensure that consumers are providing informed, voluntary consent.
It was further recommended that consumers be clearly informed of the risks of harm and consequences associated with the collection, use, and disclosure of personal information at the time of decision, to support an informed choice.
Clark v. Scotiabank
Date: Ontario Superior Court Decision, 2004
Summary:
Mr. Clark alleged that Scotiabank and Equifax Canada Inc. improperly disclosed his personal financial information without consent.
Damages / Costs Awarded:
Have you had a similar experience with Scotiabank?
Submit your review | |
1 2 3 4 5 | |
Submit Cancel |